--- G G wrote: > From G G Sun Jul 25 22:12:09 1999 > Received: from [12.78.118.172] by > web506.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 22:12:09 EDT > Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 22:12:09 -0400 (EDT) > From: G G > Subject: Re: Hopeless > To: Ramsey > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Length: 1164 > > Ramsey friend- > > I did not understand this statement: > > "With that in mind, hypothetically, what would be > our defense if we conveyed information from the > source himself?" > > Why would you need a defense to conveying info from > the source himself? > Are you wrapped up in something dangerous or ilegal > with the source? > Has he threatened or attempted to blackmail you? We > all make mistakes, > but we shouldn't have to pay for them with our souls > for the rest of > our lives. > > Are you saying that you know something, but no one > will listen or no > one will believe you? Why don't you try to tell me? > I am not close > minded. I have considered mamny possibilities - an > intruder, Fleet > White, the McReynolds. etc. I am open to all > possibilities. I do not > think that John Ramsey ahd anything to do with this. > I wonder if Patsy > might be covering for someone. I wonder if Burke may > have had emotional > problemns which contributed to this, but I cannot > say for certain that > either Burke, patsy or anyone else for that matter > committed the crime. > > Gail > >